Hello, On May 31 17:01 Antonio Larrosa wrote (excerpt):
Just wondering... let's do a small poll. How would you call ... 1) The macro that has one argument (package name) and returns its version number? a) pkg_version b) pkg_version_number c) package_version d) pkg_ver other?
c) package_version because I prefer readability over abbreviations because in the whole IT we have way too many abbreviations.
2) The macro that has 3 arguments (package_name, operator, version number) and tests whether the condition is true or not? a) pkg_version_test b) pkg_version_check c) pkg_version d) is_pkg_version e) test_pkg_version other?
other because I would like to see a word that is already commonly used for comparison functionality like "if" or "cmp" i.e. something like package_version_compare or for those who think abbreviations are really better: pkg_version_cmp pkg_ver_cmp pkg_vcmp pvcmp pvif pif nice to see how abbreviations make things more and more incomprehensible ;-) Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX GmbH - GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton - HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org