22 Apr
2017
22 Apr
'17
21:45
On 2017-04-22 22:36, Karl Sinn wrote:
What I don't get is why to keep the Leap part. I didn't like it before, but will like it less, with the reason for it effectively lost on going down from 42 to 15. I won't type or speak the superfluous term, just as I already don't.
+1 for leaving the "leap" away. It's one word to much and it gives no additional information to the version number.
It does... it is an hybrid of SLE and TW. It gets the core (30%?) from one and the rest from the other. As that doesn't change, the "leap" word has to stay. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 42.2 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar)