As a case-in-point: When I went to look for a high-res version of the
openSUSE Tumbleweed logo to include in a request I received for an
openSUSE branded version of my wallpaper, I found three different
versions. Naturally I assumed based on the guidelines and history of
Geeko, and the use of the symbol as the official symbol of the project
for more years than I can rightly remember, that the one that included
the chameleon head must be the correct one. The infinity logo says
nothing about openSUSE, and neither does the leap icon. This is what
happens when you don't include it in the logos associated with your
official projects, people will make alternate versions that do.
Because it's part of the community pride having a logo that's
recognisable as openSUSE. You don't have to take my word for it,
though. If you put it to the community, or indeed the person(s)
responsible for the openSUSE branding documents/graphics, I believe
you'll get the same sentiments. :)
Anyway. That's really all I have to say on the matter. Feel free to
use my (re)constructed version as a logo, an icon, or whatever you
feel like doing with it. It's cc0 as far as I'm concerned. If anyone
would like to see alternate versions of the other options, I'm happy
to help.
Enjoy.
-C
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:54 PM, C R
Where would the guidelines state that the Chameleon HAS to be part of every single icon?
Icon or logo?
Quote from the artwork guidelines page: "Please refer to the openSUSE Trademak guidelines if you want to redistribute openSUSE-based projects with openSUSE logos."
Both LEAP and Tumbleweed are official parts of the openSUSE project, no? If so, note that the brand guidelines are there to disambiguate official openSUSE projects from the general public as stated on the trademark page:
"With these Guidelines, we wish to encourage widespread use of the openSUSE trademarks by the openSUSE community while managing that use to protect the distinctive value of the trademarks and avoid confusion on the part of op"enSUSE users and the general public. The sections that follow describe the openSUSE Marks covered by these Guidelines, as well as uses of these Marks that are allowed, uses that are not allowed, and uses that are only allowed with specific permission. See "Contact Information" below to request permission."
It is not so much that you MUST include it in symbols/logos/whatever that represent parts of the official project, but rather that failing to do so does not protect the distinctive value of the trademarks, or avoid confusion on the part of openSUSE users and the general public.
-C
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:17 PM, C R
wrote: The openSUSE Trademark guidelines do not require the use of the openSUSE logo, they just control and set the terms of use of the openSUSE logo, which is a Registered Trademark
The Tumbleweed and Leap logos are the official, valid, logos of the Tumbleweed and Leap distributions produced by the openSUSE Project
Actually, for openSUSE brand awareness, you probably should include part of the chameleon. Suit yourself though. Shame... someone really spent a lot of time on the branding guidelines to have them ignored.
We don't need to blast the chameleon on everything we do
Regards,
Richard Brown - written while wearing my openSUSE Tumbleweed T-shirt http://shop.opensuse.org/#!tumbleweed+t-shirt-A104040222 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org