On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
Todd,
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 16:08 -0400, Todd Rme wrote:
Can we please get some consistent, agreed-upon, publicly-available rules for how update-alternatives should be implemented?
Thanks for raising that issue here - there is indeed a good need for that. And then out documentation should represent this (incl. the examples, which are a wild mix now)
In August there was an extensive thread where we were told repeatedly that the --remove part should go in %preun. All the packages I was working with were in %postun, but I changed them all to %preun as I was told. Now, I have had three packages rejected for putting --remove in %preun, telling me it has to go in %postun instead.
I might have missed that thread and the agreement.
Thread: http://markmail.org/thread/rif6ibserdu5xyhj The statement of interest: http://markmail.org/message/hpfpw6gu3cnbrpqv I don't think anyone argued that Andrei was wrong. Greg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org