Hi Stefan,
On 5 September 2016 at 20:39, Stefan Seyfried
I am a SLES customer. I have 10s of thousands of servers and VMs installed on SLES12
The only ones that have btrfs are those that are accidentally installed the wrong way. Once we notice btrfs is in use, we immediately reinstall without btrfs.
I know quite a few other SLES customers, and they all basically do the same.
So just because "it's default on SLES" and "lots of people are doing tests on SLES12" does not prove anything wrt. stability of btrfs.
:-)
I'm glad to hear you are a SLES customer, but if you are part of the SLES Beta programme, why have I not seen any posts from you on the SUSE Beta Mailinglists? SUSE have very large customers who willfully chose SLES 12 explictically for btrfs with snapshot-rollback. Those very large customers have very large environments, spanning not just the x86_64 architectures, but all other hardware architectures supported by SLES 12. We are well aware the number of customers taking the step to using btrfs are increasing, with an increasing number choosing to do so as part of their migrations from SLE 11 to SLE 12. Your experience may not match our observations, but I would say it is pretty hard to describe you as 'typical' example of either a SLES customer or an openSUSE contributor.
Best regards, and have a lot of fun...
You too :-) -- Richard Brown Technical Lead - openQA openSUSE Chairman SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org