In all respect this is really not a Freight Train issue. But even if it was the maintenance of said packages which are apparently mission critical should lay with the team working on it for their day-job. That said i do appreciate the information Richard But if we are all to work together stuff like this needs to follow a agreed on set of rules. It's just very counter productive. Mark On Wed 12 Feb 2014 09:01:39 AM PST, Richard Brown wrote:
Hi Mark,
Have you contacted the people in question, or (if they are employed by SUSE working on the package as part of their $dayjob, which I think might be true in this case) have you contacted the 'Freight Train' Team?
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Freight_Train
If you haven't, I think you should explore that option before making decisions about your maintainership with Plymouth We've got people willing to help sort these kind of problems, makes sense to me to try them first :)
Hope this helps,
Richard
On 12 February 2014 17:43, Mark van Tinteren
wrote: After only a week or so of being maintainer of this package I feel I have to relinquish maintainer-ship of this package.
The reasons for this are that after reworking the entire package this weekend and bringing it in-sync with upstream development and as i got ready to submit said changes. I found that some of you found it necessary to submit and approve your own patches without even as much as a heads up. This creates unnecessary extra work and apparently being the maintainer of a package does'nt mean much.
If any of you would like to take over Plymouth please let me know.
Mark -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org