Hi, Yesterday, I submitted three packages to factory which all were declined. Be in mind that decline is not the issue here, but can the process be reworked on cases where the packages are depending the other. Allow me to build the picture: SR# 116750 grahics/fbi Descr: this package provides exiftran which is required by rapid-photo-downloader fbi depends on libpcd-devel which was submitted as # 16718 Thanks Comment: please make sure to wait before these depencencies are in openSUSE:Factory: libpcd-devel, libpcd2 116751 graphics/rapid-photo-downloader Descr: This package depends on exiftran which is part of fbi package submitted earlier with #116750 Comment: please make sure to wait before these depencencies are in openSUSE:Factory: exiftran, rapid-photo-downloader:python-pyexiv2 116760 devel:languages:python/python-pyexiv2 Descr: this package is needed by rapid-photo-downloader which is submitted with SR# 116751 Comment: Output of check script: python-pyexiv2.spec does not appear to contain a Copyright comment. Apart from the last request (#116760) it is clearly stated that each package depends on a previous request and that is what the declination comment is saying also, Alas nothing new. So the question is since the description part is written by people for people, would it be not better in situations like this the script automatically sends a message to the factory-auto group rather than simply declining the request. As seen above it is clearly stated that the missing packages are known and they are en route. Maybe we should not allow computers to do all the work, there happens to be cases where human intelligence is needed. So the question is can the auto-check scripts improved to handle similar cases, as surely I am not the first one to hit this hurdle. Thanks Togan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org