Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (761 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] what you can do with KDE3 that you can't do with KDE4. (was: udisks2)
  • From: Jos Poortvliet <jos@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:57:54 +0200
  • Message-id: <1477192.4RoI7UfhMD@linux-6upc>
On Saturday 31 March 2012 18:52:31 Ilya Chernykh wrote:
On Saturday 31 March 2012 16:45:43 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
You're absolutely right, I stand corrected. It's Dolphin that is a
bit
awkward, not Konqueror. I'd tried switching to Dolphin as that was
the
new default.

It's what you're used too. The old Konqi is meant to be a swiss army
knife - doing lots of things reasonably well. Dolphin aims to be a
Filemanager and do THAT really really well, leaving other things to
other apps.

No. Dolphin does not provide even the basic functionality for file
management.

I would well support an idea of separating the file manager and browser
like in Nautilus and Windows Explorer, but if the file manager remains
fully functional and not such a thumb like Dolphin is.

It is definitely not a universal file manager, at best a narrow-purpose
one.

But it beats the old Konqi any time. That one didn't have the + overlay, had
no grouping, had no rating and tagging and the location bar was that old,
stupid text-entry instead of a nice bar it is now. And there was no proper
git or svn integration either. Face it, Dolphin can do lots of useful things
Konqi couldn't.

It misses two things: arbitrary splitting of the screen (only useful to demo
people what crazy shit it can do) and spatial browsing (which is so
braindead even Apple and GNOME gave up on it).

Bang, Konqi lost the feature shoot-out. Just like KMail does. And Konsole.
And Gwenview. And Kate. And KWrite. Sorry, but KDE 3 doesn't match up to 4
in terms of features. The apps might not look as cluttered as but they have
more functionality.
< Previous Next >