On 30/03/12 16:52, Ilya Chernykh wrote:
On Friday 30 March 2012 09:48:52 Basil Chupin wrote:
Note: it costed a much effort to adapt KDE3 to udisks instead of hal but for now it heavily depends on udisks1 functionality. I suspect porting to udisks2 will again need a rewrite. No, it will make you realize what a huge waste of time and resources it is to maintain a dead rotting desktop envirnonment as KDE3. I think maintaining and developing KDE4 is a much greater waste of resources. Oh, Ilya, now you are being silly - and simply peeing against a gale :-( . Is not that true that KDE4 consumes more resources?
By the way, I am fed up with those attacks on KDE3.
I am not attacking KDE 3. I am simply stating that your continuous insistence concerning KDE 3 versus KDE 4 has now reached the crescendo as expressed by yourself above and that you are peeing against a gale. I am a KDE-man - I think that KDE is the way to go. I have used Gnome (in it's old and most recent incarnations) and Unity but found that the only intelligent and practical way to get work done is to use KDE. Obviously, I have used KDE 3 but personally I found that KDE 4 is better. But that is me. I had to adjust in some ways but there was nothing which caused me to go and seek help from a psychiatrist (nor a psychologist). Some of the discussion and comments about KDE 3 vs KDE 4 is akin to religious zealotry or even be very closely aligned to bigotry. Just out of personal curiosity on my part, what is there about KDE 3 for you which could not be provided by, say, XFCE? Or even, say, another distro which has Gnome 3 as its default DE?
Let's discuss udisks2 and how we are ready for it, this is what I intended.
If you wish, but then stop bringing up your unhealthy obsession with KDE 3 :-) . BC -- Why isn't there mouse-flavoured cat food? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org