Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (715 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Warning / ANNOUNCE : upcoming changes in upstream systemd regarding /media, /tmp and /var/run | /var/lock
- From: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:34:28 +0100
- Message-id: <201203281034.29200.sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
On Wednesday 28 March 2012, Ralf Lang wrote:
At least we must not change (shrink!) to tmpfs in the update case to not
break working systems.
And whether tmpfs on fresh is installed systems is a good default is IMO
also very questionable. The only "advantage" is I see is that cleaning
it on re-boot would be faster if you have a few 1000 files in /tmp
which is also a "corner case".
cu,
Rudi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Wouldn't that mean that you don't need a few 100GB /tmp partition?
So you trade a large /tmp partition for a large swap partition? The
remaining question than is: what is more efficient?
You don't know if there even is a separate /tmp partition.
Really, we should not debate if use cases are "wrong" but how a
default of tmpfs can be implemented into openSUSE in a way not
breaking advanced setups
At least we must not change (shrink!) to tmpfs in the update case to not
break working systems.
And whether tmpfs on fresh is installed systems is a good default is IMO
also very questionable. The only "advantage" is I see is that cleaning
it on re-boot would be faster if you have a few 1000 files in /tmp
which is also a "corner case".
cu,
Rudi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |