Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (491 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] [RFC DRAFT] Phasing out sysvinit
- From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:23:56 -0300
- Message-id: <CAGTBQpY3KuO3x=uesnR_bW5cw0BkD7q7pWo62V1JfOe2iywnQQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Joerg Schilling
<Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's what all the talk about ExecStatus was all about. And yes,
openSUSE init scripts can detect dead services quite reliably, at
least in my limited experience, as most of them do further checks
beyond just verifying a pid file.
It's there already.
It's part of the LSB spec, btw. Debian link[0]
[0] http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DependencyBasedBoot
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would expect that someone who posts on an openSUSE list knows
that openSUSE sysvinit is already capable of that.
It is most unlikely that init on Suse does all what SMF can do, as there is
also the capability of detecting died services even in case these services did
double fork...
That's what all the talk about ExecStatus was all about. And yes,
openSUSE init scripts can detect dead services quite reliably, at
least in my limited experience, as most of them do further checks
beyond just verifying a pid file.
Also for automated concurrency, you need data structures that describe
dependencies, do they exist already?
It's there already.
It's part of the LSB spec, btw. Debian link[0]
[0] http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DependencyBasedBoot
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |