Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (564 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Human readable, what is that? (was [12.1] massive data loss in /var/tmp/)
- From: Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 09:22:06 +0100
- Message-id: <45698419.0CtuS18U6m@alaris>
On Thursday 29 of December 2011 09:03EN, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
By "easily" I mean that amount of work needed for that would be a
fraction of work needed to switch to systemd. As for the patches, we
already put things like that into the init scripts and often provide our
own version of init scripts. In fact, I haven't seen many packages where
OpenSuSE (or SLE) uses upstream init script without any modification
(and I'm not even sure there is any).
Michal Kubeček
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Am 29.12.2011 08:50, schrieb Michal Kubeček:
On Wednesday 28 of December 2011 22:25EN, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Am 28.12.2011 15:49, schrieb Michal Kubeček:
Reliably(!) putting each service into its own cgroup.
Reliably stopping a service and all(!) of its children.
I replied to this already. This can be easily done with init
scripts as well
Yes, by rewriting all init scripts. And keeping those patches
forever... "easily" is also something I'd dispute here.
By "easily" I mean that amount of work needed for that would be a
fraction of work needed to switch to systemd. As for the patches, we
already put things like that into the init scripts and often provide our
own version of init scripts. In fact, I haven't seen many packages where
OpenSuSE (or SLE) uses upstream init script without any modification
(and I'm not even sure there is any).
Michal Kubeček
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |