Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (564 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-factory] Re: Human readable, what is that? (was [12.1] massive data loss in /var/tmp/)
- From: Sebastian Freundt <freundt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:46:20 +0000
- Message-id: <81obutyqoj.fsf@berlin.ga-group.nl>
Sven Burmeister <sven.burmeister@xxxxxxx> writes:
Well personally I was under the impression that 12.1 is fit for production
use, only to find out it isn't, or to be less polemic, only to advise my
risk managers that *I* think it isn't.
I, as a user, certainly can't be asked to continuously assess everything
that happens during the development cycle. I was instead assuming that
the opensuse developers took a look at the upstream bug situation and
tried some of those scenarios themselves, at least the not-too-specific
ones.
So what's the official policy here? Do you want all the bugs from the
upstream tracker that apply to opensuse in the novell tracker?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Am Mittwoch, 28. Dezember 2011, 02:33:56 schrieb Joachim Schrod:
I don't know what Sebastian expects -- I would have had expected an
attitude that doesn't call for removal of sysvinit while there are
such bugs, directly after a release that didn't even had a working
postfix.
Are you sure there were never bugs in an openSUSE release that caused
services
not to start? According to your logic any of those would have indicated that
systemv is utterly broken and must not be shipped as default.
The RFC is for the next release. I do not see how starting it later would be
any better regarding pointing out bugs and fixing them. In fact, if the
testing of systemd would have got the attention from those complaining now at
this stage and during the development cycle of the 12.1 release a lot more
bugs would have been fixed already.
Well personally I was under the impression that 12.1 is fit for production
use, only to find out it isn't, or to be less polemic, only to advise my
risk managers that *I* think it isn't.
I, as a user, certainly can't be asked to continuously assess everything
that happens during the development cycle. I was instead assuming that
the opensuse developers took a look at the upstream bug situation and
tried some of those scenarios themselves, at least the not-too-specific
ones.
I also wouldn't have had expected an attitude that uses the
question "where are the bug numbers?" to squash discussion, and
then complains when there are bug numbers cited. Especially when
the complaints include wrong assertions. (That Sebastian opened one
of those bugs last week doesn't imply that all of his bugs are from
last week.)
It does imply that if bugs are not reported they cannot get fixed. And it
does
imply that reporting bugs just before Christmas holidays will unlikely lead
to
them getting fixed within a week on the openSUSE part. Sounds reasonable to
me.
So what's the official policy here? Do you want all the bugs from the
upstream tracker that apply to opensuse in the novell tracker?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |