Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (1578 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Runlevels in 12.1?
- From: Rüdiger Meier <sweet_f_a@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:58:00 +0100
- Message-id: <201111121458.00148.sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
On Saturday 12 November 2011 at 10:32, you wrote:
There are several use cases for init 3/startx:
1. Don't waste resources for X while you are mostly using the machine
from remote but only sometimes as desktop.
2. You don't want to have dangerous kdm features like user shutdown or
switching sessions while desktop is locked. If you are to lazy to
configure kdm then simply disable it.
3. If you don't use any feature of kdm at all why you should use it
then? Speaking for me I don't use any kdm feature except typing my
password whitch works even better without kdm.
cu,
Rudi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I am curious as I have had quite protracted email discussions with a
guy about runlevels. He insists using init 3 and startx is the only
way to boot a system but has never put forward a sane and rational
answer as to why. As a matter of fact, no answer at all other than
incoherent rants against xdm/gdm/kdm.
There are several use cases for init 3/startx:
1. Don't waste resources for X while you are mostly using the machine
from remote but only sometimes as desktop.
2. You don't want to have dangerous kdm features like user shutdown or
switching sessions while desktop is locked. If you are to lazy to
configure kdm then simply disable it.
3. If you don't use any feature of kdm at all why you should use it
then? Speaking for me I don't use any kdm feature except typing my
password whitch works even better without kdm.
cu,
Rudi
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |