Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (1264 mails)

[Ilya Chernykh <anixxsus@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday 30 September 2011 02:53:06 Sascha Peilicke wrote:

> > What they "have" I don't care about, I care what they maintain. You know,
> > I'm the guy who WONTFIXed a guessed value of quatro trillion thousand KDE
> > bugs because they don't apply to KDE4. So I don't want KDE:KDE3 in factory,
> > I agreed to have a KDE3 desktop. I don't see why we need to have all the
> > koffice1 bugs back.
> >
> > On top of that, you say you're not using factory - so you're doing a
> > complete wild shot in submitting all these 2008 spec files. To summarize:
> > limit yourself to a basic desktop you can **maintain** together with the
> > Trinity guy.
> Until these and the issues I mentioned are sorted out, I'm against submitting 
> any further KDE3 packages. Therefore, I declined those that are currently 
> open 
> (for the reasons mentioned).
>
> However, I am unsure on how to threat those packages that already moved into 
> Factory.

 84789  State:declined   By:saschpe      When:2011-09-29T14:47:09
        submit:          KDE:KDE3/kde3-sim  ->                              
openSUSE:Factory
        Review by Group      is accepted:  legal-auto(licensedigger)
        Review by Group      is accepted:  factory-auto(coolo)
        Review by Group      is accepted:  legal-team(babelworx)
        Review by Group      is declined:  autobuild-team(saschpe)
        From: review(Ansus) -> review(licensedigger) -> review(coolo)
        Descr: new name (kde3-), new version (0.9.5), function call fix patch
        Comment: Declined until maintainership is sorted out and spec files
               where cleaned up. Please also check Trinity project patches for
               inclusion.

What's the purpose of rejecting a newer version of a package that is 
already in Factory?
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx