Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (1264 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Religious and political views in packages
  • From: Kirill Kirillov <kirill.kirillov@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:43:43 +0400
  • Message-id: <1315658623.2304.25.camel@white.faith>
Hi!

В Птн, 09/09/2011 в 11:59 +0200, Sascha Peilicke пишет:
Hello everyone,

sr#81625 want's to add 'sword', a bible study tool to openSUSE:Factory. While
that is totally fine, the spec file %description contains stuff like:

+The SWORD Project is an effort to create an ever expanding software package
for
+research and study of God and His Word.

While I don't care much for that particular bedtime story, others may well be
offended by biased religious views (even more so if their's differing). Of
course, this may equally apply to policitcal views or offensive words.

I have the feeling that openSUSE should take neutral stance, be inviting and
open for everyone (and we're quite good at that already). But I'm not sure if
we should provide a stage for non-technical biased views. Even less so for
those with a mission. Thus, the question I'd like to ask is whether we should
allow such formulations or not. Do we already have policy for that or do we
care at all?

First of all, this description is from the sword.spec.in file, which one
can find in the upstream archive [1]. Exactly the same description is
used at least by Mandriva [2].

I will update the description if my submit request is rejected, it is
not a problem.

In my opinion, the real problem is to name God's word as a bedtime
story. I hope that the author of this disrespectful saying is smart
enough to apologise for it.

[1]
http://www.crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/source/v1.6/sword-1.6.2.tar.gz
[2]
http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/sword/current/SPECS/sword.spec?revision=686324&view=markup

--
Kirill Kirillov
<><

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread
Follow Ups
References