Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (1256 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Gnome 3 poll
- From: Robert Schweikert <rjschwei@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 07:38:54 -0400
- Message-id: <4E6211CE.2020606@suse.com>
On 09/03/2011 05:35 AM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
I do not think this claim is correct. If I remember correctly from the thread when we discussed the numbering of openSUSE releases, the drop of dot-0 had nothing to do with "dot-0 is perceived to be unstable". Numbering was chosen such that dot-1 is always in November.
Later,
Robert
--
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Tech Lead
rjschwei@xxxxxxxx
rschweik@xxxxxxxxxx
781-464-8147
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
FOSS lives on trust.No, FOSS lives on its contributors, not random trolls who do nothing but bitch
around
(even worse, considering that GNOME 3.x forces nobody to use GNOME Shell as it
ships with
a GTK3 port of the classic GNOME 2.x desktop/panel)
Well he is right.No, he's not. Dot-0 releases in community FOSS projects are usually not for end
users.
Everyone with some slight insight (=the typical Factory tester) knows that.
Heck, that's exactly why openSUSE no longer releases dot-0 versions of its
distribution.
I do not think this claim is correct. If I remember correctly from the thread when we discussed the numbering of openSUSE releases, the drop of dot-0 had nothing to do with "dot-0 is perceived to be unstable". Numbering was chosen such that dot-1 is always in November.
Later,
Robert
--
Robert Schweikert MAY THE SOURCE BE WITH YOU
SUSE-IBM Software Integration Center LINUX
Tech Lead
rjschwei@xxxxxxxx
rschweik@xxxxxxxxxx
781-464-8147
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |