On Tuesday 16 August 2011 23:23:56 Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
on Dienstag, 16. August 2011, phanisvara das wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:20:25 +0530, jdd
wrote: I think most user have never any problme with apparmor; In fact I never had any
no problem really; i just un-install it as soon as it tries to block something i need (which happens soon after every fresh install of oS).
Please open a bugreport! Attach /var/log/audit/audit.log and I'm sure your problem will be solved (for you and all other users). You can CC me (I'm "suse-beta [at] cboltz DOT de" in bugzilla) in these cases - that might speed up things a bit. And always keep Pascal's wise words (see .signature) in mind! ;-) So you're the first one stepping up to actually fix something as it seems you do care for it. That's good.
(This note is aimed at all people that uninstall AppArmor if it blocks something, not only at you.)
not running a server here and being pretty aware of what's going through my "broadband" connection (512 kB/s) because there is so little of it, i don't see the need for apparmor. there isn't much *nix specific malware in the wild, so i don't really know why it's needed at all,
Because some additional security can never hurt. Even if AppArmor can "only" prevent/block a single attack against your system, it was useful for you ;-) Naa, that doesn't justify running apparmor+auditd on my laptop letting it drain the battery just for the case that I may run postfix on it (which has decent profiles). -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Sascha Peilicke