Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (505 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: I'm a user, and I don't want systemd
- From: Eberhard Moenkeberg <emoenke@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 01:11:45 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1107020106470.18289@gwdu06.gwdg.de>
Hi,
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Linda Walsh wrote:
I really like Linda's idea of a "hybrid approach".
It would avoid the initial (huge!) disturbance systemd would serve us, and allow a smooth way to a "total" conversion when systemd really is ready, step-by-step.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoenke@xxxxxxx Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1551
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Goettingen (GWDG)
Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Goettingen
URL: http://www.gwdg.de E-Mail: gwdg@xxxxxxx
Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1510 Fax: +49 (0)551 201-2150
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Prof. Dr. Oswald Haan und Dr. Paul Suren
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Christian Griesinger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Goettingen
Registergericht: Goettingen Handelsregister-Nr. B 598
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Linda Walsh wrote:
Linda Walsh wrote:
Can I ask a question about this....and maybe someone could explain why----
this would be 'infeasible'
Why not have 'init' start things as it does now up through the 'boot' scripts', then turn starting 'services' over to the task of 'systemd' when hardware to serve all the user -level application programs that
expect it to be there during the 'startup' process?
I.e. a Hybrid approach?
Sorry let that off a bit before I fleshed it out...
But the line between what comes before and what comes after, presumably
would be something that could change in the future, as parts of the
'boot' scripts' that were (are) known to be safe to execute concurrently with
other system startup processes, could be moved there as well...
It might even allow a stepping stone approach to moving toward systemd, as
support is included to support things like early mounting, etc.... as those
things are added, more processes/scripts could be turned over to systemd on
subsequent releases....
This way, it seems like it could have be benefit of not having a major
jolt or incompatibility worry...?
Just a thought, but everytime I try to rush to do something I'm almost guaranteed to 'miss something'....
I really like Linda's idea of a "hybrid approach".
It would avoid the initial (huge!) disturbance systemd would serve us, and allow a smooth way to a "total" conversion when systemd really is ready, step-by-step.
Viele Gruesse
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@xxxxxxx, em@xxxxxxx)
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg
Arbeitsgruppe IT-Infrastruktur
E-Mail: emoenke@xxxxxxx Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1551
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gesellschaft fuer wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung mbH Goettingen (GWDG)
Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Goettingen
URL: http://www.gwdg.de E-Mail: gwdg@xxxxxxx
Tel.: +49 (0)551 201-1510 Fax: +49 (0)551 201-2150
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Prof. Dr. Oswald Haan und Dr. Paul Suren
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Christian Griesinger
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Goettingen
Registergericht: Goettingen Handelsregister-Nr. B 598
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |