Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (551 mails)

[Herbert Graeber <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 23.05.2011 10:42, schrieb Guido Berhoerster:
> * Ludwig Nussel <ludwig.nussel@xxxxxxx> [2011-05-23 09:08]:
> > Should we assign some badness value to this warning ie make it an
> > error? There are currently 118 packages in Factory with
> > file-contains-date-and-time.
> No, not in its current state which produces false positives. I
> use a hack to replace __DATE__ and __TIME__ with the date and
> time extracted from the .changes file:
>
> modified="$(sed -n '/^----/n;s/ - .*$//;p;q' "%{_sourcedir}/%{name}.changes")"
> DATE="\"$(date -d "${modified}" "+%%b %%e %%Y")\""
> TIME="\"$(date -d "${modified}" "+%%R")\""
> find .  -name '*.[ch]' -print0 |\
>     xargs -0 sed -i "s/__DATE__/${DATE}/g;s/__TIME__/${TIME}/g"
>
> This has the advantage that the application will still have some
> halfway useful date and time information where it expects it.
> Unfortunately rpmlint still complains at least for the first
> build because it checks for the current date in the binary.
I used this method for my quassel rpms and I get still a
file-contains-date-and-time for the first build after a change. This is
because the modification time ist close to the build time in many cases.

Herbert
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx