Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (838 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] 11.5 vs. 12.0
- From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:26:31 -0500
- Message-id: <4D7A7767.8090404@suse.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2011 02:16 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Maybe not, but some of them definitely reduce the maintenance load,
allowing developers to work on more interesting things.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk16d2cACgkQLPWxlyuTD7LsHQCfYp2hzMXkU+Vg4i4/3kprOfrh
EWYAn3qqewEfLEMxvMN0Z7x1cfI7BmSm
=TCLZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2011 02:16 PM, Per Jessen wrote:
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 11:33 +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:[snip]
On Monday, March 07, 2011 07:37:02 PM Kim Leyendecker wrote:
I think everybody jumped on your 11.5/12.0 discussion but you raised
another question that got lost:
What´s the technology way we want do for the 11.4 successor?
So, are there any great ideas that people want to do?
That's what I *want*, not necessarily what I want to *do*. :)
Nice list, but just about zero end-user impact.
Maybe not, but some of them definitely reduce the maintenance load,
allowing developers to work on more interesting things.
- -Jeff
- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk16d2cACgkQLPWxlyuTD7LsHQCfYp2hzMXkU+Vg4i4/3kprOfrh
EWYAn3qqewEfLEMxvMN0Z7x1cfI7BmSm
=TCLZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |