Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (396 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-factory] Status of request #56582
- From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 01:24:35 +0100
- Message-id: <4D2CF4C3.4090200@gmx.net>
Hi,
a few weeks ago the coreboot-utils package was split into coreboot-utils
and flashrom. coreboot-utils is still part of factory and I'm happy
about that.
The split off flashrom package has not been included in factory yet
AFAICS. Its inclusion is tracked in request #56582. It would be great to
have flashrom in factory again.
If the dependency on request #56581 is a problem, we can submit a
flashrom package without that dependency.
Legal info:
The flashrom package does not contain new code. The same flashrom code
was part of coreboot-utils in factory since 11.0, so a legal review is
probably not needed.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
a few weeks ago the coreboot-utils package was split into coreboot-utils
and flashrom. coreboot-utils is still part of factory and I'm happy
about that.
The split off flashrom package has not been included in factory yet
AFAICS. Its inclusion is tracked in request #56582. It would be great to
have flashrom in factory again.
If the dependency on request #56581 is a problem, we can submit a
flashrom package without that dependency.
Legal info:
The flashrom package does not contain new code. The same flashrom code
was part of coreboot-utils in factory since 11.0, so a legal review is
probably not needed.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |