Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (508 mails)

[Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le lundi 13 décembre 2010, à 15:36 -0800, Greg KH a écrit :
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:30:28AM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 12 décembre 2010, à 19:19 +0100, Lars Müller a écrit :
> > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:35:18PM -0500, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> > > > > I haven't followed the full issue here, but I hope / assume that there
> > > > > will be a Tumbleweed testing repo before this is process is fully
> > > > > baked.
> > > > > Packages get submitted there first.  If they work well for a week or
> > > > > two, then they go to the real tumbleweed repo.
> > > >
> > > > The team maintaining a project at the OBS has to care about this.  Every
> > > > project member has to be aware of the potential risk.
> > > >
> > > > Why not using Factory to address your concerns?
> > >
> > > Because it doesn't address the need for various packages? If Factory
> > > tracks version 1.3.x (development version of 1.4.x) of foo and
> > > Tumbleweed tracks version 1.2.x (stable version), that just doesn't
> > > work.
> >
> > Yes it will.  When 1.4.x becomes stable, Tumbleweed will update to that
> > and you will be happy.
>
> Let me clarify the issue: Tumbleweed has 1.2.0, Factory
> (openSUSE:Factory and the devel project for the package) has 1.3.5, and
> I want to push 1.2.1 to Tumbleweed. How do you do that?

You send me a submitreq to accept the 1.2.1 package.  It's not that
hard.

thanks,

greg k-h
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx