Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (508 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed request for packages
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:23:42 -0800
  • Message-id: <20101213232342.GB24422@xxxxxxx>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:57:44AM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi Greg,

Le jeudi 09 décembre 2010, à 10:01 -0800, Greg KH a écrit :
Hi all,

The openSUSE:Tumbleweed repo is now up and has exactly one package that
will install properly, git. :)

Jiri is working on getting the kernel packages building properly, and
I'm looking at linking to network:samba:STABLE as that's a good place to
get the latest stable samba packages.

But, what I need from you all, is a request for what packages do you
feel I should be updating right now, and hopefully you can provide a
pointer to the repo for where these packages are (if they are only in
FACTORY, that's fine as well.)

Can you elaborate on how Tumbleweed is managed? As far as I can see,
you're making links to other projects (and, eek, git is a link to a home
project -- that's something that should be avoided, imho: never link to
home projects).

Why not? I trust the home project to have the proper version of that
package. Would you like it better if somehow I just link to the Factory
version instead? I trust the home project more as I know it builds and
works properly on the 11.3 base, not just Factory.

My understanding was that you wanted to use a model like the Factory
one, where we push things to Tumbleweed when they are ready. But with
links, that works a bit differently: (assuming we add some apps stuff
from GNOME:Apps) when we update a package in GNOME:Apps, there's no hard
guarantee it will work. We try to make that guarantee when we push from
GNOME:Apps to Factory. I thought it'd be the same for Tumbleweed, but
if it works with links, there's no way to make that guarantee.

Why not, these are just "links" of a copy type, not a link that
instantly propagates.

i.e. I'm linking to a specific revision of the package, which should be
fine, right?

In all cases, you can add all of GNOME:STABLE:2.32, I guess. If you use
links, though, we will have to remember to change the links for a new
GNOME version (since we'll likely use GNOME:STABLE:3.0 for the next
version, etc.)

What do you think the proper management model for Tumbleweed would be to
make your life as a package mantainer easier? In the end, I want to
make it easiest for you, not me as a project manager.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups
References