Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (508 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Tumbleweed request for packages
- From: Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:16:03 +0100
- Message-id: <20101212141603.GA21448@xxxxxxx>
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 02:04:04PM +0100, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
And let the repo's maintainer suffer from that? I disagree.
Of course the first approach was to only revert the changes package wise
one-by-one. In the end for each package the changes needed to be reverted. Due
to the huge dependancy chain in X11:Xorg together with our slow build service
this took a whole day.
Best regards,
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2010/12/12 Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx>:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:51:51PM +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:36:29 +0100, Marcus Meissner <meissner@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Just link all interesting packages you want to test in, and do your
changes.
Which for X libs would mean a huge number of links. Very practical
indeed.
And breaking other's repos is any better? During the day the repo was
broken I
received 3 bugreports and various personal emails about this breakage. It
costs me a day and without the friendly help of my collegue Jiri Slaby it
would have taken much longer to fix the issue.
First notice I have about this. But without knowing how much test the
patch received before SR and how difficult it was to find a package
that required the internal symbols, I would argue X11:XOrg is a repo
people should expect can break from time to time, and this kind of
"tests" should be allowed.
And let the repo's maintainer suffer from that? I disagree.
But the important thing is why it took you a full day, with help, to
fix it. Revert a patch should be trivial... but there is no easier way
than "osc co -r <latest-1>; osc ci", true?
Of course the first approach was to only revert the changes package wise
one-by-one. In the end for each package the changes needed to be reverted. Due
to the huge dependancy chain in X11:Xorg together with our slow build service
this took a whole day.
Best regards,
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |