Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (648 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] libjpeg-turbo
- From: Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 15:54:07 +0100
- Message-id: <4CD6BD8F.4090303@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 07/11/10 15:40, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
Right, we have libjpeg8 in 11.3, but we should also take care of older libjpeg6. Fixed.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o
openSUSE Boosters Team Lihovarska 1060/12
PGP 0xA6917144 19000 Praha 9
prusnak[at]opensuse.org Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2010/11/7 Pavol Rusnak<prusnak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 07/11/10 13:53, Pavol Rusnak wrote:
On 04/11/10 19:46, Andrew Jorgensen wrote:
There are other good reasons to use libjpeg-turbo, namely the 2-4X speed
(also battery) improvement.
I can prepare the package, push it to factory, obsolete and remove all
existing ones, this is not a problem. Problem is we have to evaluate
possible breakages, so I won't do it before I get GREEN from our
openSUSE Release Team (coolo atm).
JFYI: I prepared the newest libjpeg-turbo package in home:prusnak repo. The
spec is adapted from Fedora Rawhide, but I changed it accordingly to our
shared library policy and added (hopefully correct) Obsoletes and Provides.
That "libjpeg62 obsoletes and provides libjpeg8" is probably wrong?
Shouldn't it obsolete/provide libjpeg6?
Right, we have libjpeg8 in 11.3, but we should also take care of older libjpeg6. Fixed.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol RUSNAK SUSE LINUX, s.r.o
openSUSE Boosters Team Lihovarska 1060/12
PGP 0xA6917144 19000 Praha 9
prusnak[at]opensuse.org Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |