Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (648 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] libjpeg-turbo
- From: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:26:41 -0300
- Message-id: <4CD34131.8070804@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
El 04/11/10 18:36, Andrew Jorgensen escribió:
Sure, with jewels like
http://ldn.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/porting-lsb-demo and some incantation
you will be able to run the application, just by FSM's grace ;)
That example goes as far as recommending (!) static linking to "increase
the portability" of the application.. security and mainteniance disaster
ensued.. not to mention memory/disk space usage..
Now, that example isnt going to work in openSUSE, we have ensured such
insanity will fail miserably ;)
Making it an standard *API* definition instead of an ABI would make me
remove the label of "insanity" from it.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I realize that in some cases LSB fails to accomplish this goal but in
this case it would have succeeded as it does in many cases.
Sure, with jewels like
http://ldn.linuxfoundation.org/lsb/porting-lsb-demo and some incantation
you will be able to run the application, just by FSM's grace ;)
That example goes as far as recommending (!) static linking to "increase
the portability" of the application.. security and mainteniance disaster
ensued.. not to mention memory/disk space usage..
Now, that example isnt going to work in openSUSE, we have ensured such
insanity will fail miserably ;)
If you feel that LSB is failing to accomplish this in some way please
step up and help give them constructive suggestions as to how it could
be accomplished better.
Making it an standard *API* definition instead of an ABI would make me
remove the label of "insanity" from it.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |