Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (648 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] systemd (feature #310327)
- From: Brandon Philips <brandon@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:55:12 -0400
- Message-id: <20101104145512.GE5112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 10:47 Thu 04 Nov 2010, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
I would wait and see how upstream and systemd works out where the X
tmpfiles.d conf ends up.
I know you are half joking but installing systemd by default makes good
sense as we seem to plan on using it eventually as default.
For Factory it would really lower the barrier for users testing systemd
(init=/bin/systemd) if we don't end up using it as init for 11.4.
Also, and more importantly to this discussion, if we install systemd by
default in Factory we could skip my silly and possibly broken tmpfiles
script and just use /lib/systemd/systemd-tmpfiles instead in aaa_base.
Cheers,
Brandon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
So, IMO, we should move the two files from systemd to another package that
gets installed on its own and can be used without going to systemd
I would wait and see how upstream and systemd works out where the X
tmpfiles.d conf ends up.
or we require systemd installation just because of these files,...
I know you are half joking but installing systemd by default makes good
sense as we seem to plan on using it eventually as default.
For Factory it would really lower the barrier for users testing systemd
(init=/bin/systemd) if we don't end up using it as init for 11.4.
Also, and more importantly to this discussion, if we install systemd by
default in Factory we could skip my silly and possibly broken tmpfiles
script and just use /lib/systemd/systemd-tmpfiles instead in aaa_base.
Cheers,
Brandon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |