Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (286 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: observed significant performance improvement in XFS a real-world application
  • From: "Nikanth Karthikesan" <KNikanth@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 07:53:47 -0600
  • Message-id: <4C6ED643020000C50005316D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-----

On 8/20/2010 at 06:53 PM, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
BEGIN PGP
SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/20/2010 12:26 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2010-08-20 06:16, Linda Walsh wrote:
Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Besides, you cannot install a boot record onto XFS, so you always
need a
second partition
----
Some have had this problem.
I have never had this issue. My root (and boot) partition are xfs.

It is a documented and known problem.
---


Yes -- a documented problem in Grub. Not in XFS.
SuSE maintainers thought GRUB was more important than the ability to use
1 file system for all your file systems.

Personally, I disagree, since it is GRUB that is doing things, that
were documented as being problematic, since before GRUB was even conceived.

Personally I don't miss the days of forgetting to run lilo after every
kernel update and being greeted with LILILILILILI or whatever it was.


But as long as one runs lilo...

Lilo should be taken out back and shot. This is even more true as more
file systems are developed that lilo can't possibly ever work with, like
btrfs.


I thought LILO is file-system agnostic?

And LILO is the only possible way to use a brand-new file-system, whenever
a new file-system comes out, till GRUB learns the format?!

Thanks
Nikanth

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups