Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (286 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Fwd: observed significant performance improvement in XFS a real-world application
- From: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:16:13 +0200
- Message-id: <20100816091613.78b67491@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:33:28 -0700
Linda Walsh <suse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Of course - if it allows me to recover my config file :-P
Really, I was sometimes happy that old reiserfsck --rebuild-tree basically
dug up all the stuff that ever was written to a disk, after an accidental
rm ;-)
But to put some constructive things onto the discussion: I think that ext3
(or maybe nowadays ext4) is still a reasonable default file system for the
root and boot partitions. For data partitions, I also use XFS, and am
happy with its performance. Until I want to delete a large kernel source
tree. Then I'm always annoyed ;-)
Besides, you cannot install a boot record onto XFS, so you always need a
second partition anyway (Might not be 100% technically correct. You
cannot install grub into it at least).
--
Stefan Seyfried
"Theory and practice sometimes clash. And when that happens,
theory loses. Every single time." -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Linda Walsh <suse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So really -- you may not like it, but zeroing it is the safest thing
to do (besides being a security requirement).
In other words -- other files systems leave those files in a corrupt and
undefined state. Are you saying this is preferable?
Of course - if it allows me to recover my config file :-P
Really, I was sometimes happy that old reiserfsck --rebuild-tree basically
dug up all the stuff that ever was written to a disk, after an accidental
rm ;-)
But to put some constructive things onto the discussion: I think that ext3
(or maybe nowadays ext4) is still a reasonable default file system for the
root and boot partitions. For data partitions, I also use XFS, and am
happy with its performance. Until I want to delete a large kernel source
tree. Then I'm always annoyed ;-)
Besides, you cannot install a boot record onto XFS, so you always need a
second partition anyway (Might not be 100% technically correct. You
cannot install grub into it at least).
--
Stefan Seyfried
"Theory and practice sometimes clash. And when that happens,
theory loses. Every single time." -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |