* Andreas Jaeger <aj@novell.com> [07-02-10 11:06]:
On Friday 02 July 2010 16:56:04 Thomas Schmidt wrote:
Shouldn't we call this 12.0? Reassigning the features afterwards would be additional work.
Naming of the next release is a separate discussion we might have. I'm opposed to both 11.4 and 12.0 and look forward to great proposals,
Yes, it is disconcerting to refer to both. But what is the reasoning to jump to 12.0 rather than a more seemingly normal advance to 11.4 absent some very significant change, ie: a major kernel change/shift, a distro change in direction, support for very new and exciting technology, major change in approach to security. I would prefer that ##.0 vers would signify land moving events and ##.#? version indicate advances in more normal situations. The recent versioning appears to somewhat follow the redman mindset and be for "publicity" purposes only, ie: no sanity involved. -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org