Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (517 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] RFC: removal of heartbeat-* from Factory
- From: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:02:55 -0400
- Message-id: <AANLkTil1QKdttLhghcC2sRdohR77diQ8aMyGfaD1Uqcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Tim Serong <tserong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tim,
I first used heartbeat 10+ years ago, so I'll be sad to see it go.
Also I think V.3 is a valuable asset to openSUSE, but I can't
volunteer to support it. Have you asked anyone at LINBIT if they
would consider it? I believe some of that team has suse / novell
ties.
IIRC, they even use OBS to publish heartbeat. And they are providing
the upstream support so handling openSUSE issues should be a
relatively small effort for them.
Assuming the delete goes forward:
Can you explain what this means for 11.3? Is heartbeat not going to
be part of the release? I'm a little surprised a significant delete
request is allowed post RC2, but I understand the logic.
Also, unless July 5 is in stone, it seems a very poor choice. This
weekend is a major US holiday and many people that might care about
heartbeat may not even by on e-mail between now and July 6.
Greg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Everybody,
I've recently updated most of the High Availability packages
in network:ha-clustering:Factory to current stable versions
(corosync 1.2, openais 1.2, pacemaker 1.1 etc. - previously
we had openais 0.80.x and pacemaker 1.0.x, which were really
quite old).
This leaves the question of what to do with the heartbeat
package. Currently we have version 2.99.3, which gives us:
- heartbeat
- heartbeat-resources (obsoleted by resource-agents)
- heartbeat-common (obsoleted by cluster-glue)
- heartbeat-ldirectord (obsoleted by resource-agents)
- associated lib & devel packages
Upstream, heartbeat is now at version 3.0, but is effectively
in "maintenance mode" (i.e. not under active development)[1].
So, we should either upgrade heartbeat in Factory to version 3
(and make it use the new resource-agents and cluster-glue
packages as dependencies), or drop it.
I personally am in favour of dropping it, because:
- We have a current version of corosync/openais as an
alternative messaging layer for Pacemaker clusters.
- Heartbeat is no longer under active development.
- I am not currently in a position where I can upgrade
and/or maintain the Heartbeat packages myself.
Accordingly, if nobody objects (or offers to become maintainer)
before the end of Monday July 5[2], I'll put in a deleterequest
for heartbeat in Factory some time on Tuesday.
Regards,
Tim
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg14520.html
[2] I will of course wait for Monday July 5 to finish everywhere
in the world.
--
Tim Serong <tserong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Senior Clustering Engineer, OPS Engineering, Novell Inc.
Tim,
I first used heartbeat 10+ years ago, so I'll be sad to see it go.
Also I think V.3 is a valuable asset to openSUSE, but I can't
volunteer to support it. Have you asked anyone at LINBIT if they
would consider it? I believe some of that team has suse / novell
ties.
IIRC, they even use OBS to publish heartbeat. And they are providing
the upstream support so handling openSUSE issues should be a
relatively small effort for them.
Assuming the delete goes forward:
Can you explain what this means for 11.3? Is heartbeat not going to
be part of the release? I'm a little surprised a significant delete
request is allowed post RC2, but I understand the logic.
Also, unless July 5 is in stone, it seems a very poor choice. This
weekend is a major US holiday and many people that might care about
heartbeat may not even by on e-mail between now and July 6.
Greg
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |