Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (600 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Status: distribution
  • From: Larry Stotler <larrystotler@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 11:02:00 -0400
  • Message-id: <9bb996600910010802y160e5e79uebc08e49af21c8f5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:14 AM, phanisvara das <phani00@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what's driving up the hardware requirement: operating system or desktop
environment?

Good question. Supposedly, KDE has gotten faster and uses less
resources than ever. At least since 3.x came out, each version is
supposed to be leaner from my understanding. I installed SuSE 7.3 on
my Wallstreet and it flew, and all the hardware worked properly out of
the box. KDE2 was very responsive, and browsing was acceptable.
11.0/KDE3 was painful.

i was trying to run KDE 4.3 on a slow machine (amd single core, 1,700, 1 GB)
and found it way too slow. when i switched over to fluxbox things got much
better.

I ran 11.0/Beta3 on a PowerMac 6500/225 with 128MB RAM(Max) and even
using fluxbox or IceWM it wasn't usable. The G3/266 should be twice
as fast and the 512MB should have been better. Also, I've ran
11.0/KDE3 on my 1Ghz P3 laptop with 512MB and it was very usable.

that was on openSUSE 11.1 though; haven't tried it on factory yet.

Nor have I. Haven't played with KDE4 much to see if it's getting to
the point that I can use it. Planning to tho.

512MB should be fine for most users IMO. If you can run XP with a
1Ghz P3 and 512MB well, then openSUSE should be usable as well.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >