Quoting Bryen M Yunashko
What he's saying is that with a better improved zypper with in-place live updating, it would be less painful for some people to update and the 18 or 24 months become less relevant.
That implies that if the `zypper dup` sucks, it will be relevant. Would it not be a good idea to say that if all is well, we go to 18 months, but if there are still serious issues, we stay with 24 months? What I mean is to still have an official statement of 18 months, but the realization that if there are issues, we still can go to 24 months for 11.2. With 11.3 these issues should be solved, so 18 months should not be an issue for 11.3 onward. houghi -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org