On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 20:17 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
2. You, as the author, are the only one who could dual license it to stop such discussions once and for all.
I already asked you to stop your claims!
What you are doing is called slander.
There is no need to dual license the code as there is no license problem.
I have stood by silently while watching this poor thread go down in flames. When Luis originated this thread, I do not believe it was his intention to turn this into a political debate but merely to discuss the technical merits of switching from cdrkit to cdrtools. That technical discussion has not occurred sufficiently because of sidetracking and strange accusations. Joerg, there is nothing stated in Stephan Kleine's statement above that can be interpreted as slanderous. You have the right to decide whether to add a second license or not. That is not slanderous, that is recognition of the fact that you own copyright to cdrtools. Maybe there is a significant language barrier that you keep re-reading and mis-interpreting things as slanderous. If you feel a statement acknowledging your ownership is slanderous, take it to court. Otherwise, please, let's just get off the pot and get back to the real intention of this discussion. If it doesn't go anywhere, then I am going to recommend that this thread be closed because it is not getting us anywhere and cluttering the inboxes of people who want to have meaningful discussions. Sincerely, -- Bryen Yunashko openSUSE Board Member GNOME-A11y Team Member www.bryen.com (Personal Blog) www.planet-a11y.net (Feed aggregator of the Accessibility Community) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org