Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (471 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Plans and Issues for ATI fglrx Driver for 11.2?
- From: Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:38:51 +0200
- Message-id: <20090625123851.GA30267@xxxxxxx>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 02:27:54PM +0200, Susanne Oberhauser wrote:
And nvidia-gfx, nvidia-gfxG01, nvidia-gfxG02.
No, this would be the first step. Second step would be to find
someone, who does the packaging work.
Well, get rid of proprietary drivers is what the open source community
wants ...
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:24:41PM +0200, Susanne Oberhauser wrote:
Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:39:49PM +0200, Susanne Oberhauser wrote:
Now what we _can_ do is, we start building the different ati driver
versions in parallel in an obs project:
project: ati-fglrx
packages:
ati-fglrx-8.8
ati-fglrx-8.9
ati-fglrx-8.10
ati-fglrx-9.1
ati-fglrx-9.2
..
Unfortunately we can't do this for fglrx driver and probably any
proprietary driver in obs. So either for this we would need a 3rd
party buildservice or convince ATI to host such a system of repos.
packman?
How many years do I know provide the RPMs "sources" in
X11:Drivers:Video for building the fglrx locally via osc or a 3rd
party buildservice (same for nvidia, btw)?
For quite a while and it's a real cool thing, an excellent starting
point.
Currently youu have the fglrx, fglrxG01 and fglrxG02 packages.
And nvidia-gfx, nvidia-gfxG01, nvidia-gfxG02.
In _theory_ each of them is covering a larger number of chipsets. In
practice, the current versions break some older card.
Now the question would be if it would be hard to 'save' the package when
a new driver version comes out, e.g. in some X11:Drivers:Video:Previous?
Finding a project to eventually host the resulting binaries will then be
the next step,
No, this would be the first step. Second step would be to find
someone, who does the packaging work.
and we'll need to explain why this is a good thing for the adoption
of Linux, and how this actually supports the open source community.
Well, get rid of proprietary drivers is what the open source community
wants ...
Stefan
Public Key available
------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5
FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg
http://www.suse.de Germany
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |