Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (471 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Plans and Issues for ATI fglrx Driver for 11.2?
- From: Susanne Oberhauser <froh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:27:54 +0200
- Message-id: <s2iskhowl9x.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx> writes:
For quite a while and it's a real cool thing, an excellent starting
point.
Currently oyu have the fglrx, fglrxG01 and fglrxG02 packages.
In _theory_ each of them is covering a larger number of chipsets. In
practice, the current versions break some older card.
Now the question would be if it would be hard to 'save' the package when
a new driver version comes out, e.g. in some X11:Drivers:Video:Previous?
Finding a project to eventually host the resulting binaries will then be
the next step, and we'll need to explain why this is a good thing for
the adoption of Linux, and how this actually supports the open source
community.
Makes sense?
S
--
Susanne Oberhauser +49-911-74053-574 SUSE -- a Novell Business
OPS Engineering Maxfeldstraße 5
Processes and Infrastructure Nürnberg
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:24:41PM +0200, Susanne Oberhauser wrote:
Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:39:49PM +0200, Susanne Oberhauser wrote:
Now what we _can_ do is, we start building the different ati driver
versions in parallel in an obs project:
project: ati-fglrx
packages:
ati-fglrx-8.8
ati-fglrx-8.9
ati-fglrx-8.10
ati-fglrx-9.1
ati-fglrx-9.2
..
Unfortunately we can't do this for fglrx driver and probably any
proprietary driver in obs. So either for this we would need a 3rd
party buildservice or convince ATI to host such a system of repos.
packman?
How many years do I know provide the RPMs "sources" in
X11:Drivers:Video for building the fglrx locally via osc or a 3rd
party buildservice (same for nvidia, btw)?
For quite a while and it's a real cool thing, an excellent starting
point.
Currently oyu have the fglrx, fglrxG01 and fglrxG02 packages.
In _theory_ each of them is covering a larger number of chipsets. In
practice, the current versions break some older card.
Now the question would be if it would be hard to 'save' the package when
a new driver version comes out, e.g. in some X11:Drivers:Video:Previous?
Finding a project to eventually host the resulting binaries will then be
the next step, and we'll need to explain why this is a good thing for
the adoption of Linux, and how this actually supports the open source
community.
Makes sense?
S
--
Susanne Oberhauser +49-911-74053-574 SUSE -- a Novell Business
OPS Engineering Maxfeldstraße 5
Processes and Infrastructure Nürnberg
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |