Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (471 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] status distribution
- From: Cristian Morales Vega <cmorve69@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:39:27 +0200
- Message-id: <8235e6f40906180939o1171340cx174251d706763551@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009/6/18 Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>:
Seriously? Because I think "now I will have to open an account in its
bug tracker and...". When I'm not busy I report upstream, but when I
have anything else to do the last thing I want is open yet another
account in yet another bug tracker.
My fault, but... perhaps OpenID will make people report more to upstream.
I don't really mind about getting credit for some minor patches. But I
suppose it's important to upstream because of legalities.
Anyway, Wireshark 1.2.0 builds with --as-needed because of the new
behavior in binutils, but it still has a problem that triggers if you
use pre-2.20 binutils. The patch is available at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=wireshark-1.2.0-asneeded.patch&package=wireshark&project=openSUSE%3AFactory
and I'm the author.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 03:01:52PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Maybe it's a good idea filling bugs to maintainers so they can be awareI don't think it's a bug if a package doesn't work out of the box with
of this problem.
different linker flags.
I think the opposite way. Being involved in Wireshark development I
have to go and check all the big distros for changes made, find out
why and by whom and then apply what appears to be useful.
<rant>
It's *really* annoying! Why can't the package maintainers open a bug
with Wireshark for every patch that isn't 100% distro specific and
let the project maintainers decide what is acceptable and what isn't?
Seriously? Because I think "now I will have to open an account in its
bug tracker and...". When I'm not busy I report upstream, but when I
have anything else to do the last thing I want is open yet another
account in yet another bug tracker.
My fault, but... perhaps OpenID will make people report more to upstream.
While I'm ranting anyway: Each and every patchfile that is part of
a source package should contain a description and information on the
author(s) - how am I supposed to give credit correctly otherwise when
I decide that a patch is useful? Normally figuring out the credits
part is more work than finding out whether to apply a patch or not.
</rant>
I don't really mind about getting credit for some minor patches. But I
suppose it's important to upstream because of legalities.
Anyway, Wireshark 1.2.0 builds with --as-needed because of the new
behavior in binutils, but it still has a problem that triggers if you
use pre-2.20 binutils. The patch is available at
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=wireshark-1.2.0-asneeded.patch&package=wireshark&project=openSUSE%3AFactory
and I'm the author.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |