Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (257 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] The plan to speed up openSUSE 11.2
- From: Cristian Morales Vega <cmorve69@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 01:15:09 +0200
- Message-id: <8235e6f40905251615u720de16mcda39fb6c88d5c05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009/5/25 Randall R Schulz <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx>:
Doing a quick test between KUbuntu 9.04, fresh installed, and openSUSE
11.1 with "LD_DEBUG=statistics /usr/bin/firefox" and summing all the
"total startup time in dynamic loader" entries openSUSE uses >40% more
clock cycles than KUbuntu. Not sure if that's the best metric, but...
Sorry not to give raw data, I don't have time right now.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Monday May 25 2009, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
2009/5/25 Martin Schlander <martin.schlander@xxxxxxxxx>:
So I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss these reports. And also I
wouldn't focus only on boot speed, but also analyse application
startup speed.
Well, application startup speed... makes me think about link time.
Was https://bugzilla.novell.com/362947 ever tested?
I was going to suggest, yesterday, that library dependencies might be an
issue.
Doing a quick test between KUbuntu 9.04, fresh installed, and openSUSE
11.1 with "LD_DEBUG=statistics /usr/bin/firefox" and summing all the
"total startup time in dynamic loader" entries openSUSE uses >40% more
clock cycles than KUbuntu. Not sure if that's the best metric, but...
Sorry not to give raw data, I don't have time right now.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |