Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (257 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] The plan to speed up openSUSE 11.2
- From: Cristian Morales Vega <cmorve69@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:49:54 +0200
- Message-id: <8235e6f40905251149r479d579eta07283cde14e6069@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
2009/5/25 Martin Schlander <martin.schlander@xxxxxxxxx>:
Well, application startup speed... makes me think about link time. Was
https://bugzilla.novell.com/362947 ever tested?
Between, in my updated openSUSE 11.1 system:
$ readelf -d /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox | fgrep PATH
0x000000000000000f (RPATH) Library rpath:
[/usr/lib64/mozilla-xulrunner190-1.9.0.10]
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
[/usr/lib64/mozilla-xulrunner190-1.9.0.10]
...the funny thing is that xulrunner is installed in
/usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.0.10, not in
/usr/lib64/mozilla-xulrunner190-1.9.0.10.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
So I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss these reports. And also I wouldn't focus
only on boot speed, but also analyse application startup speed.
Well, application startup speed... makes me think about link time. Was
https://bugzilla.novell.com/362947 ever tested?
Between, in my updated openSUSE 11.1 system:
$ readelf -d /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox | fgrep PATH
0x000000000000000f (RPATH) Library rpath:
[/usr/lib64/mozilla-xulrunner190-1.9.0.10]
0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH) Library runpath:
[/usr/lib64/mozilla-xulrunner190-1.9.0.10]
...the funny thing is that xulrunner is installed in
/usr/lib64/xulrunner-1.9.0.10, not in
/usr/lib64/mozilla-xulrunner190-1.9.0.10.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |