Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (279 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Openoffice 3.0.0.16 for x86_64
- From: Stephan Kulow <coolo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:59:08 +0100
- Message-id: <200903031459.09836.coolo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Am Dienstag 03 März 2009 schrieb Joerg Mayer:
require all packages in a specific version to work well together. If one of
those fails, you get this problem. That it's only a problem on x86_64 and not
on i586, shows that's not a general problem with rules.
tell yast/zypper to take that solution.
Greetings, Stephan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:31:54PM +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:What other packages? OpenOffice_org is split into several packages that
Am Monday 02 March 2009 18:55:34 schrieb Markus Koßmann:
Why are OpenOffice_org-3.0.0.16-1 x86_64 rpm and
OpenOffice_org-icon-themes- prebuilt-3.0.0.16 x86_64 rpm missing on
download.opensuse.org for over a day now ? That creates nasty
dependency
Because the package failed to build.
Doesn't that mean that the rules that push the other packages into the
repository aren't strict enough because we now have dependency problems?
require all packages in a specific version to work well together. If one of
those fails, you get this problem. That it's only a problem on x86_64 and not
on i586, shows that's not a general problem with rules.
Is it unrealistic to add such a rule or at least keep the old packagesYou can keep the old packages on your factory installation just fine. Just
until the dependencies for the new packages are fulfilled?
tell yast/zypper to take that solution.
Greetings, Stephan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |