Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (279 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Openoffice 3.0.0.16 for x86_64
- From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:53:56 +0100
- Message-id: <20090303135356.GH26762@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:31:54PM +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote:
Doesn't that mean that the rules that push the other packages into the
repository aren't strict enough because we now have dependency problems?
Is it unrealistic to add such a rule or at least keep the old packages
until the dependencies for the new packages are fulfilled?
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Am Monday 02 March 2009 18:55:34 schrieb Markus Koßmann:
Why are OpenOffice_org-3.0.0.16-1 x86_64 rpm and
OpenOffice_org-icon-themes- prebuilt-3.0.0.16 x86_64 rpm missing on
download.opensuse.org for over a day now ? That creates nasty dependency
Because the package failed to build.
Doesn't that mean that the rules that push the other packages into the
repository aren't strict enough because we now have dependency problems?
Is it unrealistic to add such a rule or at least keep the old packages
until the dependencies for the new packages are fulfilled?
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |