Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (422 mails)

[Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 10:01:46AM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> Il lunedì 05 gennaio 2009, Greg KH scrisse:
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:58:30AM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> > > Il domenica 04 gennaio 2009, Greg KH scrisse:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:54:14PM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> > > > > Hi all, I think that we don't have such features, avaible in
> > > > > other distro. So I just filled an enhancement request to
> > > > > bugzilla (with some details..):
> > > > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463446
> > > >
> > > > 'make binrpm-pkg' should already provide the majority of this for
> > >
> > > I'm trying but:
> > > make[1]: *** [binrpm-pkg] Error 1
> > > make: *** [binrpm-pkg] Error 2
> >
> > Try 'make binrpm-pkg V=1' to get a better idea what the error is.
> It's strange... no error under "original" kernel but failure under 
> rebuilded kernel..

Care to provide a list of that error?

> > > This is what I'm asking for: a "magic" but simple tool
> >
> > Heh, gotta dream big :)
> I don't think it is so big..

Great, care to create the patch to do this?

> Only a little question:
> I removed unused modules, all debug options, hz 250 -> 1000 and cpu 586 
> -> athlon/k7.
> After a quick test with ramspeed and glxgears the new kernel seems 
> slower then original one. is this right ?

Yes, increasing hz can decrease throughput.

good luck,

greg k-h
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx