Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (422 mails)

[Daniele <kailed@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Il lunedì 05 gennaio 2009, Greg KH scrisse:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:58:30AM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> > Il domenica 04 gennaio 2009, Greg KH scrisse:
> > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:54:14PM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> > > > Hi all, I think that we don't have such features, avaible in
> > > > other distro. So I just filled an enhancement request to
> > > > bugzilla (with some details..):
> > > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463446
> > >
> > > 'make binrpm-pkg' should already provide the majority of this for
> >
> > I'm trying but:
> > make[1]: *** [binrpm-pkg] Error 1
> > make: *** [binrpm-pkg] Error 2
>
> Try 'make binrpm-pkg V=1' to get a better idea what the error is.
It's strange... no error under "original" kernel but failure under 
rebuilded kernel..
> > not a usefull error..
> > but make only goes fine...
> > I didn't try but I'm quite sure that rpm generated in this way
> > cannot be used to replace suse package without dependecies
> > problems..
>
> That is exactly correct.
>
> > > you. But to do it all properly, you need to build the kernel
> > > using the spec file that is provided to you by the suse kernel
> > > engineers.
> >
> > This is what I'm asking for: a "magic" but simple tool
>
> Heh, gotta dream big :)
I don't think it is so big..
> > for building an rpm with a susefied spec file. At least with right
> > "provide" and a call to mkinitrd and update-bootloader. This is
> > enough for testing or for build a kernel on host A and then move to
> > another host...
> >
> > An enhanced version of mkspec should be enough..
> >
> > http://www.howtoforge.com
> > a lot of: how-to compile a kernel - $distro way
> > The suse way is, IMHO, the worst one..
>
> Have you tried the build service?
too much.
It seems that nobody care about this, so ok for me..

Only a little question:
I removed unused modules, all debug options, hz 250 -> 1000 and cpu 586 
-> athlon/k7.
After a quick test with ramspeed and glxgears the new kernel seems 
slower then original one. is this right ?

opensuse-11.0, kernel-2.6.25.18-0.2-default

Bye.

-- 
*** Linux user # 198661 ---_ ICQ 33500725 ***
    ***  Home  http://www.kailed.net  ***
        ***  Powered by openSUSE  ***

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx