Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (422 mails)

[Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:58:30AM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> Il domenica 04 gennaio 2009, Greg KH scrisse:
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 03:54:14PM +0100, Daniele wrote:
> > > Hi all, I think that we don't have such features, avaible in other
> > > distro. So I just filled an enhancement request to bugzilla (with
> > > some details..):
> > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463446
> >
> > 'make binrpm-pkg' should already provide the majority of this for
> I'm trying but:
> make[1]: *** [binrpm-pkg] Error 1
> make: *** [binrpm-pkg] Error 2

Try 'make binrpm-pkg V=1' to get a better idea what the error is.

> not a usefull error.. 
> but make only goes fine...
> I didn't try but I'm quite sure that rpm generated in this way cannot be 
> used to replace suse package without dependecies problems.. 

That is exactly correct.

> > you. But to do it all properly, you need to build the kernel using
> > the spec file that is provided to you by the suse kernel engineers.
> This is what I'm asking for: a "magic" but simple tool

Heh, gotta dream big :)

> for building an rpm with a susefied spec file. At least with right
> "provide" and a call to mkinitrd and update-bootloader. This is enough
> for testing or for build a kernel on host A and then move to another
> host... 
>
> An enhanced version of mkspec should be enough..
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com
> a lot of: how-to compile a kernel - $distro way
> The suse way is, IMHO, the worst one..

Have you tried the build service?

thanks,

greg k-h
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx