Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (1210 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
[opensuse-factory] Re: Liberation Fonts vs agfa-fonts [was: Re: dropping packages]
- From: Marc Ensenbach <gueltigbis22062008@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:17:56 +0100
- Message-id: <gemc3m$8g5$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Stephan Kulow schrieb:
"font blind eyes" may be a part of the problem. Is someone with thorough
typographical knowledge involved in the decision process on fonts?
As someone with strong interest in typography and fonts, I can say that
for me the look of the fonts on the screen was not only once the reason
for me not to upgrade the system. (Mostly because of this, I still use
SuSE 10.0 at work, since the look of fonts there is much superior
compared to openSUSE 11.0.) I think, it would beneficial for the user
experience of openSUSE, if the look of fonts (on the screen) would
stronger be taken into account.
Regards,
Marc
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
dejavu is our default, but I use liberation-fonts 1.04 now and I have to say
the difference to the arial webfont I used before is not noticable to my
font blind eyes :)
"font blind eyes" may be a part of the problem. Is someone with thorough
typographical knowledge involved in the decision process on fonts?
As someone with strong interest in typography and fonts, I can say that
for me the look of the fonts on the screen was not only once the reason
for me not to upgrade the system. (Mostly because of this, I still use
SuSE 10.0 at work, since the look of fonts there is much superior
compared to openSUSE 11.0.) I think, it would beneficial for the user
experience of openSUSE, if the look of fonts (on the screen) would
stronger be taken into account.
Regards,
Marc
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |