Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (475 mails)

["Rajko M." <rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 20 August 2008 03:22:25 am Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 20 August 2008 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
> > > It is not meant to be used by people who want "that package", because
> > > it'll definitely be removed from "Contrib-testing" at some point:
> > > either when it's stable enough for "Contrib-stable", or when it's
> > > deemed not good enough for "Contrib-stable" (not actively
> > > developed/supported, too buggy, foreporting nightmare, side-effects,
> > > ...).
> > >
> > > Does that cast another light on "Contrib-testing" in your eyes or are
> > > you still opposed to it ?
> >
> > But then you would need everyone to be able to write to that repo, that
> > sounds uglier than a wiki page to me.
> >
> > But I understand your proposal now - and I think it's different to what
> > Richard proposed.
>
> No, besides the name the proposals are the same.  Contrib/unstable should
> be a staging area.  (Much like we have this extra patches repository
> where patches are put early)

Is it possible to keep naming consistent with other names in opensuse.
 
Contrib : 
Third party contributions, not part of official distro, but following distro 
development and release cycle, so:

Contrib/11.0
Contrib/Factory

Testing area will be Contrib/Factory, and the rest frozen after the release. 

Is there something that I miss in discussion? Do we look for the naming that 
is closer to common language (testing vs. factory). 

-- 
Regards, Rajko
http://en.opensuse.org/Portal needs helpful hands.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx