Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (475 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Contrib repository
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:55:29 +0200
  • Message-id: <48AAD0D1.5070708@xxxxxxx>
Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Dienstag 19 August 2008 schrieb Alexey Eremenko:
For now: Richard and Yaloki asked for contrib-unstable branch. Let's
discuss it. What is the advantage of contrib-unstable over users OBS anyway
?

I think this lowers the number of people testing it even more. And home:*
is the unstable branch of contrib in the general case, so I see little use of
it. And after all, it's only developed against Factory and Factory alone has
not enough users to split it.

Plus:
* it's one more possible source of error for packagers (package A newer
in contrib than in contrib-unstable, package B in contrib but not in
contrib-unstable, package C building fine in contrib-unstable, but not
in contrib)
* it's one more possible source of confusion when reporting and dealing
with bugs (
"The splash screen in package D is not green!"
"Are you sure you have the latest version? I fixed that last week"
"I did 'zypper in D' and it's still not green!"
"Oh, are you using the stable repository perhaps?")

Also, I think all of us will be happy if we attract enough packagers and
have some 100+ packages in the beginning. If massive amounts of changes
to Contrib turn out to be a problem later, we can always create
-unstable then.


So I'm pretty much against that suggestion.

Me too, at least for now.

Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups