Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (475 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] if the community contributed?
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:08:24 +0200
  • Message-id: <48A40418.2010006@xxxxxxx>
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
Wasn't the original plan to package 'useful utilities' or something
among these lines? Now adding this old compiler just to be able to
compile a package written in historic C++ (didn't we talk about
maintainability / upstream support?), this old library because another
project didn't catch up with api changes (likewise), this new library
because this cool app unfortunately requires features only found in svn
HEAD of said library - where does this stop? I'm affraid that without a
hard rule of not duplicating packages from the distro, the new
repository won't be much different from existing repos (and I'm not sure
I would still want to participate in that).

Hmmm...
So you believe this is absolutely evil ?

Not 'absolutely evil' but it can cause trouble (trust me - e.g. we had
enough fun in devel:laguages:python with python-curl requiring newer
curl and newer curl replacing old curl required by rest of the system on
older distros). I was hoping for a repository without these problems,
which could be safely added as installation source without having to
disable all the time. IMO, in 90% of the cases where some package needs
a newer/older version, someone just needs to sit down and port the
package to the distro. The remaining 10% could then be handled case by case.

And yes, so far I'm interested and I listed myself on your draft page :)

Michal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
This Thread