Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (475 mails)
| < Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] if the community contributed?
- From: Martin Schlander <martin.schlander@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:39:57 +0200
- Message-id: <200808101639.58160.martin.schlander@xxxxxxxxx>
Søndag 10 august 2008 16:01:18 skrev Druid:
Just putting everything together in one repo would definitely be a bad idea.
But maybe creating some big extra/contrib/community repo that follows the
openSUSE release cycle, and is then frozen at release time wouldn't be a bad
idea. It shouldn't be a packager playground, and probably shouldn't have
packages that are prone to security issues either though. Should be frozen and
somewhat tested stuff - the purpose being to provide _more_ packages, not
providing latest.
Bleeding edge would be available on other smaller dedicated BS repos for
experts and adventurous people.
Also I think grouping existing BS projects more - and cleaning dublicate and
obsolete projects would alleviate many of these complaints about the current
BS situation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Christian Boltz <opensuse@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
on Sonntag, 10. August 2008, Bernhard Walle wrote:
It _is_ a problem. I always end up in having 20 repositories added to
my package manager, having lots of updates installed just because I
want to have a few programs installed and up to date. And after 9
month of usage, I end up in a reinstallation for $NEXT_RELEASE
instead of updating because it's less work for me.
I have currently 14 repos, and always install new versions as update.
Yes, sometimes there are some conflicts to solve, but it takes much
less time than restoring all config changes etc. I did.
You are all assuming that OSS and the other repos are exactly the same
thing. It is not. OSS is the release repo, its frozen, it was tested
(was it? I hope so), its a release, should have minimum release
quality. Its what people should be using. The other repos are random
stuff, non tested, use at your own risk, may break your computer, may
eat you.
So yes, there is a big difference between release and stuff in buld
service. And no, putting everything together in big repo sounds like a
terrible idea.
I dont have 14 repos. I have only the classic oss+packman+updates
repos, and a couple of RPMs that came from buildservice or customs,
which is what people more or less should stick to, if you ask me. If
not, there is no purpose of having a release, we could just be using
factory and complaining about brokenness on continuous upgrading,
which is what happens in debian anyway...
The repos are separated for a reason.
Just putting everything together in one repo would definitely be a bad idea.
But maybe creating some big extra/contrib/community repo that follows the
openSUSE release cycle, and is then frozen at release time wouldn't be a bad
idea. It shouldn't be a packager playground, and probably shouldn't have
packages that are prone to security issues either though. Should be frozen and
somewhat tested stuff - the purpose being to provide _more_ packages, not
providing latest.
Bleeding edge would be available on other smaller dedicated BS repos for
experts and adventurous people.
Also I think grouping existing BS projects more - and cleaning dublicate and
obsolete projects would alleviate many of these complaints about the current
BS situation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| < Previous | Next > |